I'm trying to re-post this, because I started it as a way of finding out about the history of the street names in this area and therefore of coming up with a more appropriate name for the upper part of Kirkdale than the misleading "Kirkdale Village".the traders in and around the Old High Street have decided to rename the area "Kirkdale Village".
I think it's a cringe-worthy name, as well as being historically inaccurate and very misleading.
What do others think?
When and why was Kirkdale so named? I know the upper part used to be Sydenham Hill Road and I believe was changed to Kirkdale circa 1936, but what about the rest of the road?
If the cart goes before the horse and the area is renamed without proper public consultation (and I also wonder what Lewisham and Royal Mail have to say) and prior to regeneration, then does anyone have any more appropriate suggestions for a name?
Sadly, it got locked and diverted to a thread about a logo. I'm not interested in a logo for a name I don't believe has credibility. I think Lee's green dragon or grey hound would do the job of a logo for Sydenham very well. So, I'm trying to start this discussion about historical street/area names again.
And I'll kick it off (standing by to duck):
I for one would like to see the top part of Kirkdale (i.e. above the junction with Dartmouth Road) revert to its earlier name of "Sydenham Hill Road". I'd settle for "Upper Kirkdale". Plus, if we need to "brand" the shopping area here, then I'd prefer the more accurate "Sydenham Old Town".
This is a serious post and, before they start slinging mud my way again, I am not knocking the traders' efforts. But "Kirkdale Village" is misleading ... and if it is just the name of the shops then it smacks of "Bicester Village" type developments or shopping malls.
Incoming ... ducking now.