[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

I would disagree (with the first bit);Eagle wrote:Not sure betting shops good for the economy overall.
It is the opposite to Mr R Hood . They take from the poor for the rich.
We could say exactly the same of pubs too Annie. I don't frequent either of them.Annie. wrote:Thats fine- as long as you can afford it. :0))
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Many families have been deprived because of Dad's (or Mum's) drinking habits, also sufferEagle wrote:I agree betting shops contribute to the tax revenue , but they also take money from those who have least to spare , which they would probably spend on essentials for their family.
I dont think they are soul-less in the way funeral homes are. They are usually quite busy with people, who often get to know each other and who interact with eachother. There is always plenty of sport on the many live screens. Compared to a lot of Sydenham shops; they are always well fitted out with fronts that, if a little corporate, look relatively smart.rod taylor wrote:I suspect the principle objection is actually how unedifying and soul-less they are. The same arguments are made against Chicken Shops, Funeral Care Shops and Loan Sharks.
I suppose I was asking why people find them so objectionable when they don't use them. Can't people just live and let live?rod taylor wrote: simon wrote:It seems strange to me that the people who most object to the proliferation betting shops are the people who never use them.
Why does that seem strange?
Now, now!Eagle wrote:How can Deptford support so many betting shops.
In the day time assume the good burghers are out working. What do these shops do.