I walked past the shop last night and it looks pretty rubbish. It looks like the yellow fronted shop a couple of doors down is going to be something exciting though...I saw what looked like hairdresser chairs..brilliant.

An excellent idea, at least as a first step.Stefan wrote:maybe rather dismissing a new shop straight away and complain to the authorities, why not work with them rather against them, why cant the sydenham society or local counciler pay them a visit, explain the situation to them, let them know what kind of help and grants are out there, what the locals expect from a new shopfront and make them aware of the forum, it may be the owners are thinking that the design is great and adds to the highstreet and happy to change it if it causes just a stir, also worth remebering that there are only a handful of people on here complaining so some locals might just be pleased that a new shop is opening
Contacting our local ward councillors or working with the Sydenham Society might give an initial impression of helping, but is unlikely to achieve anything. What Stefan suggests is pretty well exactly what I did as SydSoc Chair when Kenté opened, as described herebiscuitman1978 wrote:An excellent idea, at least as a first step.Stefan wrote:maybe rather dismissing a new shop straight away and complain to the authorities, why not work with them rather against them, why cant the sydenham society or local counciler pay them a visit, explain the situation to them, let them know what kind of help and grants are out there, what the locals expect from a new shopfront and make them aware of the forum, it may be the owners are thinking that the design is great and adds to the highstreet and happy to change it if it causes just a stir, also worth remebering that there are only a handful of people on here complaining so some locals might just be pleased that a new shop is opening
But it needs people to contact their local ward councillor or to work with the Sydenham Society. Lots of people who post on here already do an awful lot, but others who feel strongly about this might want to volunteer...
Making businesses aware of this Forum is the last thing local ward councillors or the Sydenham Society will do, or if they do, it will be framed with warnings about how it is full of anonymous people saying nasty snide horrible things, undermining local enterprise, so best avoided.Embrace the Forum, even when it hurts. Talk to George at Kente. He contacted me soon after he opened, when there were some negative stuff about him here - and I was very happy to suggest how he dealt with it. I think now there are only nice things written about Kente now - which is of course mainly because it's a great little coffee shop
I'm not sure that there is 'Portas cash' to provide such incentives to shop keepers / freeholders. According to Marymck heredickp wrote:I wonder if Lewisham Council is planning to make adherence to shop design guidelines a condition of any shop freeholder / tenant taking Portas cash. 12 properties with improved sign frontage would certainly begin to make a noticeable difference to the streetscape.
Planning guidelines enforced by contact and cash incentives, as it were.
If you read what Louise wrote at the start of that thread, the money is meant more for projects to show what can be done.I asked the lady from the Council if Lewisham would be giving any incentives by way of reduced business rates, for new start ups in these shops. The answer was no.
Does anyone else think that the council should translate planning and other policy speak into understandable English? The above paragraph is utterly ridiculous.Chris Best wrote:
Lewisham Council have a report to the Planning Committee on the enforcement action regarding the installation of the yellow shutter on Thursday - http://councilmeetings.lewisham.gov.uk/ ... 20Road.pdf
with a recommendation to remove the metal shop front and metal roller shutters at ground floor level from the property for the following reasons:-
The shop front and roller shutter including associated housing are not acceptable
as they have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the
property, street scene and the Sydenham Thorpes Conservation Area contrary to
policies URB3 Urban Design; URB6 Extensions and Alterations; URB8 Shop
fronts; URB10 Roller Grilles and Shutters and URB16 New Development, Changes
of Use and Alterations to Buildings in Conservation Areas in the adopted Unitary
Development Plan, July 2004 and policies Objective 10: Protect and enhance
Lewisham’s character; Spatial Policy 3: District Hubs and Policy 15: High quality
design for Lewisham in the adopted Core Strategy June 2011, and policy 7.4
‘Local Character’ and 7.6 ‘Architecture’ of the London Plan 2011.