RSS Feeds Limits
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
RSS Feeds Limits
Seems like the STF feed is limited to 15 messages max with a refresh interval of 1 hour.
Any chance of getting at least the message limit increased?
You can easily lose around half of those 15 messages with people arranging and then cancelling a game of footie. Means I keep losing the middle of ongoing threads.
Thanks.
Great site BTW. Much better than SE23.com (shhhh!)
Any chance of getting at least the message limit increased?
You can easily lose around half of those 15 messages with people arranging and then cancelling a game of footie. Means I keep losing the middle of ongoing threads.
Thanks.
Great site BTW. Much better than SE23.com (shhhh!)
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
But doesn't Twitter just give you a hundred or so characters of the post with a link to click through to see the whole message? That's a bit lame IMO.
The good thing about feeds (and the way this site has them set up) is that feed readers will download the entire posts at intervals ready for viewing.
Works great on phones this way. I can catch up on posts on train as all the messages are there waiting and you don't have the hassle of slow/dropped out internet connections on the way in to work.
I appreciate this has bandwidth issues but 15 posts just seems too small given the activity on this site.
The good thing about feeds (and the way this site has them set up) is that feed readers will download the entire posts at intervals ready for viewing.
Works great on phones this way. I can catch up on posts on train as all the messages are there waiting and you don't have the hassle of slow/dropped out internet connections on the way in to work.
I appreciate this has bandwidth issues but 15 posts just seems too small given the activity on this site.
The RSS feed is on the fly - there is no refresh. It looks like something is cacheing the pages for you. A forced reload should fetch the latest post.
Twitter does refresh - every 30 minutes so it is not so good but some people find it more convenient.
There is the feed on the frontpage which is also refreshed, but i can't remember how often. Its Friday night, pizza & plonk time so no way am I going to try decode my awful undocumented perl script before and hopefully I should be incapable after!
Admin
Twitter does refresh - every 30 minutes so it is not so good but some people find it more convenient.
There is the feed on the frontpage which is also refreshed, but i can't remember how often. Its Friday night, pizza & plonk time so no way am I going to try decode my awful undocumented perl script before and hopefully I should be incapable after!
Admin
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
I use three different RSS readers - one on my phone, one in IE7 and one in IE8. All of these only ever download the most recent 15 posts regardless of how many new posts there are in total.
Seems like 15 is the most readers will ever retrieve from this site. I presume this is a property of the feed as different sites have different limits. Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like a configuration setting at STF end.
It would be really useful if this could be increased.
Seems like 15 is the most readers will ever retrieve from this site. I presume this is a property of the feed as different sites have different limits. Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like a configuration setting at STF end.
It would be really useful if this could be increased.
Yes - the RSS is set to 15 posts. It is an arbitary figure as some devices are using RSS because they don't want too much data (mobile phones with small screens and enormous data tariffs!).
I shall be changing the RSS feed script shortly. What feed shape would you like (message length x number of messages)?
Admin
I shall be changing the RSS feed script shortly. What feed shape would you like (message length x number of messages)?
Admin
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
For me the message length seems fine the way it is. Reading them on a mobile means it's much quicker and convenient to be able to read whole posts rather than having to click through to read items of interest.
I would prioritise that over the number of messages but would like to see more than 15. Could we double to 30? We're only talking text (I think images are downloaded when accessed?) so we're not dealing with huge amounts of data and mobile devices and tariffs have moved on in recent years.
The other point is that if messages aren't downloaded completely or if not all new items in a thread are downloaded you have to click through to the website to get to the info you want. A single click-through will cause the mobile to download the entire content of the relevant page - graphics, html, previous posts on the same page, etc. This will be far more costly in data terms than just having the text of the post in the first place. So restrictions can be a false economy.
These comments are made on the basis of my use of feeds on a mobile. On the desktop I don't have a preference because it's so quick to click through if I need to.
The comments are also purely my personal perspective based on the way I access the forums. I'd be interested in other peoples points of view.
I would prioritise that over the number of messages but would like to see more than 15. Could we double to 30? We're only talking text (I think images are downloaded when accessed?) so we're not dealing with huge amounts of data and mobile devices and tariffs have moved on in recent years.
The other point is that if messages aren't downloaded completely or if not all new items in a thread are downloaded you have to click through to the website to get to the info you want. A single click-through will cause the mobile to download the entire content of the relevant page - graphics, html, previous posts on the same page, etc. This will be far more costly in data terms than just having the text of the post in the first place. So restrictions can be a false economy.
These comments are made on the basis of my use of feeds on a mobile. On the desktop I don't have a preference because it's so quick to click through if I need to.
The comments are also purely my personal perspective based on the way I access the forums. I'd be interested in other peoples points of view.
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
No I hadn't - but I have now. Your RSS reader should be getting 25 if pointed to: http://sydenham.org.uk/forum/rss.php
Admin
Admin
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007 18:26
- Location: Sydenhham
Just to add today Google announced new versions of Chrome (my favourite browser) for Linux and with extensions. This includes a nice RSS reader here:
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/
Admin
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/
Admin