I think that's a very good point, Mary. There is a huge difference between permanent art installations (like the mosaic on the Sydenham Centre) and temporary works as part of a festival. With the latter I think there is much less requirement for consultation and more scope for innovation. It won't all work, and it won't all be popular, but if it is temporary and used effectively to promote debate, that's a good thing. I don't like all the graffiti works, but then again I don't like the mosaic and there wasn't a big public consultation about that, despite the fact that it is permanent. Similarly, I don't like Northern Soul so I wasn't at all tempted by last week's pop-up club night. Doesn't mean I would want to stop other who do like it from enjoying the event.marymck wrote:Presumably this is all just temporary and it will be removed at the end of the festival?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
For me, an evaluation of SEE3 will centre around whether they have been effective in kick starting regeneration of our high streets, not whether I personally like everything they've done. I hope we can find a balance between letting them get on with it and holding them to account.