God doesn't seem keen on any dogs: http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/2006/janfeb/truett.php
PP
Bitten by a staff on the high street
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: 8 Oct 2006 10:33
- Location: sydenham
no I'm not....Annie wrote: You are so rude bensonby
Hang on.... how does someone holding a particular opinion automatically give it validity? If an opinion is bonkers, stupid and/or utter crap then it does not somehow become valid because some moron espouses it does it?Look, each person has their own point of view, mine is prevention is better than cure, yours appears to be shut the gate after the horse has bolted, thats fine it's your opinion.
no,someone shouldn't call an opinion paranoid just because it's different from their own views - but they could be perfectly justified in calling something paranoid if it is, indeed, paranoid.....but dont say someones sounds paranoid because their opinion differs from yours.
Oh dear, Ben. This is the 2nd thread that I'm responding to you tonight, but it seems you are almost becoming a parodic troll on this site.
You cannot call someone a moron if your opinion disagrees with theirs - no matter how you try to disguise your insult in semantics. Annie's point is valid that there is a concern about muzzling dogs only after they have bitten.
Whatever the arguments of this particular, unfortunate debate; you are are not encouraging people to air their views and opinions if they fear ridicule from the likes of you...
You cannot call someone a moron if your opinion disagrees with theirs - no matter how you try to disguise your insult in semantics. Annie's point is valid that there is a concern about muzzling dogs only after they have bitten.
Whatever the arguments of this particular, unfortunate debate; you are are not encouraging people to air their views and opinions if they fear ridicule from the likes of you...