
One of things we were told to look forward to was the building being finished to the stage where at least the hoardings would be removed. I wonder what the new date for that is?
Yes well my post about giving Purelake the benefit of the doubt was somewhat tongue in cheek! Comments in my earlier post on this subject did suggest that as Purelake were not getting any money out of this now, then they are only going to commit the minimum of their workforce to it. Unless someone in authority can crack a huge whip at them (Lewisham council? Ha ha don't make me laugh) then they will continue to delay and mess about and treat this whole saga with the contempt they clearly think it deserves. It's a shame as the 'Gateway' to Sydenham is looking woeful despite all the attempts at reinventing the high street.Steveofsyd wrote:Oh come on.....really???!!!
Give Purelake the benefit of the doubt....don't make me laugh too much![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And if the 2 builders are on holiday, what about some more.? They had a lot more builders putting up those crappy flats.....what about some of them....and don't tell me we only need craftsmen because I can see a lot of building work on houses at least as old as the Greygound going on around Sydenham and quite frankly a lot more in other parts of London.
Nobody admires Shackleton more than me. But I'd go for Cicely Saunders.Tim Lund wrote:I'd go for Shackleton.
Happy to defer to others' judgements on this.Rachael wrote:Can we PLEASE not have a statue? Added to the mosaic on the Naborhood Centre and the art naff-ometer would go off the scale. I wouldn't be opposed to a sculpture, though.
Not a secret Muslim, but I did do my Ph.D at that hotbed of activism, the University of Westminster. What did I write my doctoral thesis on? Funny you should ask. It was on the use of art in public places...Robin Orton wrote:I don't go with Rachael's iconoclastic tastes - perhaps she's a secret Muslim? I've nothing against abstract sculptures, but, being a person myself, I quite like statues of people.
That's why they aren't suitable for the roundabout. Any figure on there would stand in splendid isolation, look-but-don't-touch. To me that is both old-fashioned and off-putting. While I don't like those figures on benches personally, I can see they have a role (although their very ubiquity is becoming a problem) where people can interact with them. A single figure on a pedestal (or a roundabout) is a figure of authority, not inclusion.leenewham wrote:No problem Rachael, shame you don't like the ones by the library, I think they were fab.
Realistically, there isn't going to be a Henry Moore on the roundabout, and it's not exactly relevant, but the idea of putting art in the area, be it a square, roundabout, outside the station etc is a good one.
I love the ones on benches and have seen it a lot, but the best bit is seeing people interact with them. Having art that is more than something to look at but you touch, sit, act etc along side it is lovely.
Gosh. I guess we' d all better shut up then.Rachael wrote: What did I write my doctoral thesis on? Funny you should ask. It was on the use of art in public places...
I don't think I will ever, EVER, again get the chance to pull rank by virtue of my Ph.D, I'm making the most of it.Robin Orton wrote:Gosh. I guess we' d all better shut up then.Rachael wrote: What did I write my doctoral thesis on? Funny you should ask. It was on the use of art in public places...