[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Agreed.rshdunlop wrote:I see that someone is posting photos of people with their feet on train and bus seats on Twitter and getting in trending. That might be the way to go with the pavement cycling issue. Make it bigger than Sydenham.
Rootling around the back of the adelphi tonight, trying to find lower Robert street (curiosity getting the better of commonsense thanks to peter ackroyd) every single person I could find to ask for directions had a mobile clamped to their ear or were listening to ipods.Annie. wrote:What did we all do before mobile phones!
The mobiles have limited speakers,shame the owners don,t :0))
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Oh so an elderly person's hip or pelvis broken by a small child on a bike is OK then Eagle? They should learn to ride in the parks or at school and once they have their cycling proficiency badge then they can be allowed on the roads. But never, ever the pavements.Eagle wrote:Annie
I agree except for small children. Not sure of the age limit but probably about 8. Maybe this is to high?
Totally agree!Sydenham wrote:I don't think pedestrians and cyclists sharing the same space (pavements) is dangerous in itself. An example in a busy Northern European country that clearly shows this is Copenhagen in Denmark - cyclists and pedestrians share the same space
However what does cause this to all go wrong is when any one group, or in reality individuals - be it cyclists or pedestrians or "buggy meisters" (or for that matter car drivers) do anything without consideration for others, and act as if they are the only entity that is about.
Its the inability of individuals to understand and realise the impact their individual actions have on others - a complete lack of empathy - that is the problem. We live in a city - by definition we share this space with others. If people don't want to interact with others then why live here - become a hermit or individual in the wild country.
Just my point of view.