[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

There are a couple of TfL traffic modellers who live not far from me, who I chat to - about our gardens, generally. Next time I see them I'll ask them how much flows can be tweaked by changing signals, and what is involved in deciding this.Rachael wrote:If people do want the lights etc to be looked at, they need to contact tfl. Grousing about it here isn't going to change anything.
But is the traffic on Sydenham Road itself any worse now, or is it the approach roads that we are concerned about (which are more affected by the phasing of lights)? I think it's correct that closing off the end of Queensthrope will certainly be increasing the amount of traffic on Sydenham Road itself, but not by much. If I park in Girton Road, I have to turn left onto Sydenham Road when I leave. Where before I would have then turned right onto Queensthorpe to get back to Mayow, I have to now carry on to Silverdale. But like I said, the traffic on Sydenham Road itself doesn't seem particularly worse, and I can't imagine that a few locals having to drive another minute up the road is adding much, when it's mostly through traffic, not local, on the road.FHS21 wrote:The traffic is in part due to the rephrasing of the lights but is in the main due to the fact that you can no longer get off of the high street on to side roads except at mayow road or silverdale meaning everyone goes from one end to the other. In the past people could come off and double back on themselves onto mayow if just popping into sydenham. Long term not only will traffic readjust as commuters avoid the traffic thus reducing passing trade to shops but locals faced with a trip doubled in length and coupled with reduced ability to park on the high street itself (as being forced onto car park for short stop is almost always now the only parking option) they like me and others I know start to avoid the area completely. If you have to drive further and way a distance to the shop you want well you might as well got to sainsburys to be honest. Would be interested to know just how many of the established businesses are reporting increased trade now all this 'wonderful' redesigned layout has been put in place. Suggest much more likely to be reporting reduced trade both due to works period and now that it is complete.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
What I would say to those side street residents enjoying the quite roads is that's great but I hope you will enjoy the loss of your local high street as that becomes a nice quite road as well once the pass through traffic finds a new route and the existing shops close down.hairybuddha wrote:To add to what Rachael has said, closing off the sidestreets has the wonderful effect of civilising the residential streets beyond. Sydenham is plagued with selfish rat running so if the downside of closures is a bit more traffic on the High St that's fine by me (and I'm sure by the majority of residents on those streets).
I find it very hard to believe that what you are describing will happen due to a couple of rat run closures. Rat run closures, by the way, that have been almost universally welcomed on here. But you are of course welcome to make the case.FHS21 wrote:What I would say to those side street residents enjoying the quite roads is that's great but I hope you will enjoy the loss of your local high street as that becomes a nice quite road as well once the pass through traffic finds a new route and the existing shops close down.
Locals "popping in" to Sydenham shouldn't be doing so in their bloody cars. That's the whole point. If the above speculation is correct, and the new road layout discourages excessive through traffic, then it will be a far better environment for the people that live here, rather than those who just want to transit it as quickly as possible. Then it might even become a place that people choose to pop in to without feeling the need to surround themselves in a lavishly upholstered steel cage.FHS21 wrote:Locals popping into sydenham to shop does not just mean those in roads adjacent to the high street. It was easier to park in sydenham than penge, forest hill or crystal palace
Your anti-car ranting, which seems increasingly to be dominating this forum, is becoming a little tedious, HB.hairybuddha wrote: Locals "popping in" to Sydenham shouldn't be doing so in their bloody cars. [Etc, etc]
Of course there are plenty of people who need to use their cars Robin, that's fine. But the vast majority of people I see getting out of their cars on the High St either a) could and should have used an alternative mode of transport and b) could probably benefit from some more physical activity in their life as they waddle from Wimpy to the betting shop and back again. It's win winRobin Orton wrote:You are no doubt young and fit. Others are less so, and rely on their cars for shopping trips. Even for the more mobile, shopping for bulky or heavy items on foot is not a practicable proposition.
I was not of course 'trying to shut down discussion', HB, but merely to give you a hint. I am sure you will feel free to ignore it.hairybuddha wrote:People trying to shut down discussions that they don't like on here is definitely becoming tedious, Robin.
Certainly not. You never know, I might miss something interesting!hairybuddha wrote:Here's a hint for you Robin: Use the ignore button.
So can't be HB, I'm sure, whose posts, on most subjects, are usually interesting and enlightening.Rachael wrote:I have one poster here on my ignore list. Fairly sure I'm not missing anything interesting.