[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

'Pleasure' to me suggests something intense and short-lived. For that reason I wouldn't myself want to make it an important criterion for either happiness or well-being, although I suppose if someone never or rarely took pleasure in anything, they' d probably be clinically depressed and to that extent would score badly on well-being.rod taylor wrote: So pleasure, for example would be extraneous to that system?
So is there a qualitive difference between contentedness and pleasure?
You're right about our seeing 'colonial' exploitation here in our own cities, rather than in some remote corner of Empire - not that it's not still happening, and even worse, in those other parts of the world. I also think trade unions should be part of the solution - workers need independent organisations to argue for them. But while it's not exactly diplomatic to say 'the British are too lazy', the fact remains that many foreign workers will do more for less, or in worse conditions, than British workers - simply because of what we / they are used to.rod taylor wrote:With a non-English speaking workforce, with no union representation, who with a favourable exchange rate uses Western Union Money Transfer to send wages back to Poland or Nigeria and lives in all sorts of conditions which we might not find acceptable; And what we have is a modern form of colonialism. Except this time, the colonialists import their labour and earn vast bonuses on the back of their labour.
The excuse that is always trotted out is that these people are doing the work the British are too lazy to do. The reality is that they cannot afford to do it.
I don't accept his conclusion that we should stop immigration; rather we should recognise that our currencies will depreciate to the extent that it's their teenagers who'll be coming on gap years over here in future generations, rather than the other way round - and our young people facing discrimination over there as economic migrants. Not exactly the end of the world, just needs a bit of swallowed pride.
Uneducated? Most of the Africans I meet around here seem very well educated. They accept however that economically they are better off doing comparatively unskilled work here than trying in vain to find work appropriate to their qualifications in their home countries. And I don't see how we are 'exploiting' them by letting them come to this country (to the extent that we do) to better themselves economically.rod taylor wrote: For the life of me I cannot think of the benefit of having an uneducated African workforce in this country. Could there ever be any reason other than exploitation?
Free movement of labour is likely, other things being equal, to increase overall prosperity. Again, in what sense am I being exploited if I move to a country where my skills are more in demand (and better rewarded) than they are here?rod taylor wrote:And, to be honest, if we can do something NOW to avoid a situation where we ourselves are exploited labour in other parts of the world in 30 years time, shouldn't we do it? This globalization scam IS optional. We just need the protectionist policies to avoid it.
What like during the worst double dip recession for over 50 years?Eagle wrote:Or withdraw the Dole ,Rod.
The Dole is a gift that society generously gives to those who through no fault of their own cannot get employment.
Not wholly unexpected - whatever the original topic, one can guarantee that before long we are going to be invited to talk about benefit scroungers.rod taylor wrote: Sometimes threads move in unexpected directions.
Nice to see you've noticed Robin.Robin Orton wrote:Not wholly unexpected - whatever the original topic, one can guarantee that before long we are going to be invited to talk about benefit scroungers.
Remind anyone of Life of Brian?rod taylor wrote:There is no benefit to the country of immigration other than cheap labour. If you can name one I'd be interested?
I know. I don't agree with your view on immigration, but I think it's more reasonable than Rod'sEagle wrote:It was Rod who attacked immigrants.
Of course they have - and I might say some of those wicked English imperialists made significant contributions to the places they colonised. Hope Mikecg will forgive me saying this ...Eagle wrote:I think immigrants through the centuries have made a great contribution to our sceptered isle.
I agree that this problem will get worse, and resentment of foreigners is very likely to increase. But blaming immigrants is like shooting the messenger - and the message they are telling us is that we have become uncompetitive . There's a quick way and relatively painless way to become more competitive - devalue the exchange rate. There's another way, which is far from painless which has the same effect - cut wages; it's something like this that Greece, Portugal, Spain are being asked to accept, because they've refused option 1. But neither is anything like as helpful as the long run solution, raising productivity, which depends on improving education. See my posting 'Investing in Education'. I might add that I'd include learning to smile more at customers, even foreigners, and not snarling at them as an essential part of education. As well as learning foreign languages, maths, science and economics. Some history too helps give some perspective.Eagle wrote: problem is now the sheer volume ( each year probably more than the total germanic invasions of post Roman Era )
Also we have min 3 million plus unemployed who cannot get jobs because the immigrants are cornering many occupations. I know they tend to me more articulate , smile more and prepared to work hard , but the country cannot carry on like this.
Very sad but something has to give otherwise in 10 years time you will face maybe 6 or 8 million native Britons unemployed.
I know some will consider the above remarks offensive but I think the politicians are even starting to admit this is a major problem.