Is it not time we tried to have a sensible debate Lee?leenewham wrote:What's the 'Polly'?
Where does the word 'Grauniad' come from? Why can't people just use it's real name?
Why is it ok to generalize a so called 'higher class' but not the other way around?
Demonising any 'class' is wrong (I don't believe in class).
Generalizing any class is ignorant.
Making them a scapegoat for what's wrong with the world dangerous. It sounds a bit Poll Pot to me.
Back to you Mike (I'm enjoying this).
Anyhoo,
The Grauniad was coined because of pedantry, from what I understand? the paper was littered with spelling mistakes at one point in its not too distant past.
Back on topic.
I agree Lee that the idea of existing within a classless society is a very appealing dream, but it's about keeping people in their place and keeping a strong hold on money and power, the so called establishment don't really need to stamp in the faces of the working class but they do, and will continue to do so.
Generalizing any class is ignorant but the so called chavs don't have the money and power like the other lot do, do they?